l. A New Era of International Taxation

In recent years, international tax norms have undergone significant changes to address the issues arising from globalization and digitalization. The OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project, initially launched in 2013, paved the way for a more resilient and equitable international tax framework. As part of this initiative, Pillar I and Pillar II proposals have been introduced to modernize global tax rules and tackle issues related to tax avoidance and profit shifting.

Pillar I aims to ensure that multinational enterprises (MNEs), particularly those in the digital economy, pay taxes where their users and customers are located. This represents a shift from the traditional tax concept based on physical presence. Pillar II, on the other hand, seeks to introduce a global minimum corporate tax rate to prevent profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions. Together, these frameworks address the challenges faced by tax authorities in dealing with large MNEs, especially tech giants accused of paying relatively low taxes.

ll. Understanding Pillar I & Its Impact on Indian MNCs

Pillar I proposes reallocating taxing rights for MNEs, ensuring that a portion of profits is taxed in jurisdictions where business activities occur, regardless of the company’s physical presence. The new taxing right is termed Amount A, which allocates a portion of an MNE’s residual profit to market jurisdictions based on the presence of consumers and users.

For Indian MNCs with a diverse and expanding customer base across multiple countries, this means a significant shift in tax obligations from traditional residence-based taxation to market-based taxation. Several key implications arise:

1. Expansion of Tax Base in Market Jurisdictions: Indian MNCs in sectors like IT, pharmaceuticals, and consumer goods may find that a larger portion of their profits will now be taxed in countries where their products and services are consumed. This could lead to increased tax liabilities in high-consumption markets.
2. New Compliance Requirements: With new taxation rights, Indian multinationals will need to comply with regulations across multiple jurisdictions. This may result in increased administrative costs and greater complexity in managing tax compliance globally. Adopting digital tax reporting solutions and ensuring proper documentation will be essential.
3. Technical Details of Amount A Calculation: Under Pillar I, the calculation of Amount A involves several steps. First, only MNEs with a global revenue above a certain threshold (currently EUR 20 billion) and profitability above 10% are in scope. Once in scope, the residual profit—defined as profit exceeding 10% of revenue—is calculated. A portion of this residual profit is then reallocated to market jurisdictions using a formulaic approach. For Indian MNCs, understanding the segmentation of financial data and determining which revenues are attributable to market jurisdictions will be crucial in complying with these rules.
4. Transfer Pricing Adjustments: Pillar I introduces challenges related to transfer pricing. The calculation of Amount A, alongside existing transfer pricing rules, could lead to adjustments that impact profit allocations. Indian MNCs must reassess their transfer pricing policies and methodologies to ensure alignment with the evolving global tax landscape. For instance, potential double counting of profits under both Amount A and traditional transfer pricing rules must be addressed through bilateral or multilateral dispute resolution mechanisms.

However, Pillar I also brings opportunities for Indian MNCs. With the shift towards market jurisdictions, MNCs may gain more certainty regarding tax outcomes, potentially reducing disputes related to transfer pricing and permanent establishment.

llI. Impact of Pillar II on Indian MNCs

Pillar II introduces a global minimum tax rate of 15% on large MNEs to discourage profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions. This minimum tax rate, known as the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) rules, aims to create a level playing field and curb harmful tax competition.

For Indian MNCs, Pillar II has several key effects:

1. Reduction in Tax Incentive Benefits: Indian MNCs have traditionally leveraged tax incentives offered by various jurisdictions to optimize tax liabilities. With a global minimum tax, the effectiveness of such incentives will diminish. This could particularly impact Indian companies with subsidiaries or operational units in jurisdictions offering favorable tax rates.
2. Increased Tax Costs: Indian companies with entities in low-tax jurisdictions will face increased tax costs due to the minimum tax requirement. The top-up tax payable if the overseas tax rate is below 15%, could increase the effective tax burden for many Indian MNCs, affecting their profitability. For example, if an Indian MNC has an effective tax rate of 10% in a low-tax jurisdiction, it would need to pay an additional 5% top-up tax under Pillar II to meet the global minimum tax.
3. Technical Details of GloBE Rules: The Pillar II GloBE rules apply to MNEs with consolidated revenues exceeding EUR 750 million. The Effective Tax Rate (ETR) is calculated on a jurisdictional basis, considering covered taxes and adjusted income. If the ETR in a jurisdiction falls below the minimum rate, a top-up tax is triggered. Indian MNCs will need to implement systems to accurately compute the ETR, taking into account complex adjustments such as deferred tax assets and timing differences. This will require sophisticated data collection and reporting mechanisms to ensure compliance.
4. Strategic Restructuring of Operations: Given the introduction of the global minimum tax, Indian MNCs may need to restructure their global operations. The objective would be to optimize the tax structure while complying with Pillar II requirements. Companies may reconsider their existing holding structures, re-evaluate their choice of investment jurisdictions, and adapt business strategies to align with new global tax rules.
5. Impact on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Countries that have traditionally attracted investments through preferential tax regimes might lose their allure under the new regime. For Indian MNCs considering outbound investments, the choice of jurisdiction will need to be influenced by considerations beyond tax incentives, such as market potential, infrastructure, and regulatory environment.

IV. Challenges Faced by Indian MNCs

The implementation of Pillar I and Pillar II poses several challenges for Indian multinationals:

• Complexity of Compliance: Complying with the new rules under both pillars will require significant changes to existing compliance processes. The calculation of Amount A, determining the effective tax rate under Pillar II, and managing the interrelation between different jurisdictions’ rules will create additional complexity and require skilled tax professionals. Indian MNCs will need to build internal capacity or partner with global tax advisory firms to navigate these changes effectively.
• Increased Costs: Compliance costs will increase due to the need for sophisticated systems to calculate and report tax liabilities under both pillars. Further, the risk of double taxation remains a concern, especially if countries implement these rules inconsistently. Indian MNCs need to focus on effective dispute resolution mechanisms to avoid double taxation, such as utilizing the OECD’s Multilateral Instrument (MLI) or engaging in Mutual Agreement Procedures (MAP).
• Digitalization of Tax Systems: Indian MNCs will need to invest in technology and digital solutions to handle the evolving tax environment. Automation of tax compliance processes and enhanced data analytics will become crucial to meet extensive documentation and reporting requirements. Leveraging digital tools will help MNCs streamline compliance and improve efficiency. Advanced tax reporting software capable of integrating multiple jurisdictional requirements will be necessary to reduce manual errors and enhance accuracy.
• Bilateral and Multilateral Coordination: The success of Pillar I and Pillar II depends on multilateral cooperation among jurisdictions. Lack of consensus in implementation could lead to overlapping rules, resulting in double or even multiple taxation scenarios. Indian MNCs will need to actively monitor developments in different jurisdictions and adapt their tax strategies accordingly. Additionally, ensuring that tax treaties are updated to accommodate these changes will be vital for avoiding conflicts and minimizing disputes.

V. Opportunities for Indian MNCs

Despite the challenges, the OECD’s two-pillar approach also presents opportunities for Indian multinationals:

1. Stability and Certainty: One of the main objectives of Pillar I and Pillar II is to bring stability and certainty to the international tax system. By reducing disputes related to profit allocation and tax avoidance, Indian MNCs may benefit from a clearer understanding of their tax obligations across jurisdictions, leading to fewer tax disputes and a more predictable tax environment.
2. Level Playing Field: The introduction of a global minimum tax rate ensures that large multinational enterprises are subject to a fair level of taxation irrespective of jurisdiction. This creates a level playing field, allowing Indian MNCs to compete with global players that have historically benefited from lower tax jurisdictions.
3. New Market Opportunities: The market jurisdiction focus of Pillar I incentivizes Indian MNCs to expand their consumer base in different countries. Establishing a tax presence in these market jurisdictions could allow Indian multinationals to leverage their operations to explore new business opportunities, form strategic partnerships, and enhance market penetration.
4. Improved Reputation: Compliance with global tax standards can enhance the reputation of Indian MNCs. By adopting fair tax practices, Indian multinationals can strengthen their relationships with stakeholders, including governments, regulators, investors, and customers, thereby creating a more positive image in international markets.

VI. Preparing for the Future

Indian MNCs must prepare strategically for the implementation of Pillar I and Pillar II to mitigate risks and capitalize on potential opportunities. The following measures are essential for a proactive approach:

• Re-evaluate Tax Strategy: Indian multinationals should revisit their existing tax structures and evaluate the impact of new international tax rules. This may involve recalculating the effective tax rate across jurisdictions and planning for top-up taxes where applicable. Conducting detailed scenario analysis can help in making informed decisions.
• Focus on Compliance and Technology: Investing in technology to automate compliance processes will help manage the complexities of adhering to Pillar I and Pillar II requirements. Implementing a robust tax technology system will facilitate better data management, provide real-time insights into tax positions, and reduce the risk of non-compliance. Partnering with specialized tax technology providers can offer scalable solutions tailored to the specific needs of Indian MNCs.
• Monitor Global Developments: Indian MNCs should closely monitor developments regarding the implementation of Pillar I and Pillar II. Tax authorities in different jurisdictions may take varied approaches, and companies need to be well-prepared to navigate these complexities. Engaging with international tax experts and leveraging advisory services can provide valuable insights.
• Strengthen Transfer Pricing Policies: Indian MNCs need to reassess their transfer pricing policies in light of the changes brought by Pillar I. Ensuring that transfer pricing arrangements align with the new rules is critical to managing compliance risk. This involves aligning transfer pricing documentation with the reallocation of profits under Amount A. Using Advanced Pricing Agreements (APAs) can also provide certainty and reduce disputes.
• Engage with Tax Authorities: Indian MNCs should proactively engage with tax authorities and industry associations to remain informed about the latest developments. Engaging in dialogue will also help provide inputs to shape practical and effective implementation strategies, thereby reducing compliance burdens and avoiding potential disputes.

VII. Summary of Key Elements in Pillar I and Pillar II

To better understand the impact of Pillar I and Pillar II on Indian MNCs, the following table summarizes the key components and their implications:

VII. Conclusion

The implementation of international tax agreements and the OECD’s Pillar I and Pillar II frameworks marks a transformative phase in the global tax landscape. For Indian multinational corporations, these changes bring both challenges and opportunities. While increased tax compliance requirements and costs may seem daunting, the promise of a more stable and predictable tax regime is a welcome development.

Indian MNCs must act swiftly to adapt their tax strategies, invest in technology for enhanced compliance, and explore new opportunities in market jurisdictions. By doing so, they can turn the challenges of the new international tax order into a competitive advantage, ensuring sustainable growth and success on the global stage. Embracing these changes and positioning themselves as compliant and responsible global citizens will be key to thriving in this new era of international taxation.

Share via